JJC LH-XF27 39mm
JJC
40 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Budget
Travel
Video Cinema
Portrait
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Macro
Specifications
| JJC LH-XF27 39mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 39 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 39 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | Super Integrated Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/27 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-6.3 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | for Fujifilm XF 23mm F2.8 R WR, for Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR | Nikon Z |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | — | 0.14 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 39 mm | 46 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 23 mm★ | 200 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.2x★ |
Pros & Cons
JJC LH-XF27 39mm
- Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average bokeh (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average aperture (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
Pricing
JJC LH-XF27 39mm2.201score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR0.627score per dollar
JJC LH-XF27 39mm offers 3.5x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
