Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

Sigma
52 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM

Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM

Canon
87 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Sigma
46
Canon
90
Professional
Sigma
46
Canon
89
Landscape
Sigma
38
Canon
83
Budget
Sigma
51
Canon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
52
Canon
82
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
42
Canon
81
Street
Sigma
51
Canon
72
Travel
Sigma
27
Canon
70
Portrait
Sigma
65
Canon
69

Specifications

Sigma Sports 185956 500mmCanon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min500 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm20 mm
Elements1616
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements4
CoatingAir Sphere and SWC Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/10
Min Aperturef/32f/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSigma SACanon RF
FormatFull-Framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight3.17 kg0.57 kg
Filter Thread46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance3.50 m20 mm
Max Magnification1:6.670.12x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm

  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Strong optical (67th percentile)
  • Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM is $4,352 cheaper (2.9x less).

Sigma Sports 185956 500mm0.008score per dollar
vs
Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM0.039score per dollar

Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM offers 4.9x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM

Scores 87 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 10-20mm f/4 L IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider