Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm
Tamron
56 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Portrait
Travel
Video Cinema
Street
Macro
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Specifications
| Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | — |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-S | — |
| Weight | 0.54 kg★ | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average build (24th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Pricing
Verdict
Winner: Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm
Scores 56 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 9 specs.
