Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
88 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S 100mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S 100mm

Nikon
63 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

90 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design. Users appreciate it as a versatile upgrade from kit lenses, especially for mirrorless cameras like the R7 and R5 Mark II. A single negative review is due to a delivery issue, not product quality.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
  • Versatile for various settings
Cons
  • Possible delivery mismanagement
👍 Image quality 4
👍 Autofocus performance 3
👍 Weight and portability 6
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Versatility 2
👎 Delivery experience 1

Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S 100mm

85 out of 100 medium confidence 17 reviews

The Nikon Z 100-400mm lens is highly praised for its sharpness, compact design, and excellent vibration reduction, making it a favorite for wildlife and travel photography. Users appreciate its versatility and compatibility with teleconverters, though a few note minor weaknesses like softness at 400mm and a design flaw where the reversed lens cap blocks zooming. Overall, it's considered a modern classic that delivers impressive image quality.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Compact and lightweight design
  • Excellent vibration reduction
  • Versatile for wildlife and travel
  • Compatible with teleconverters
Cons
  • Softness at 400mm
  • Lens cap blocks zoom when reversed
  • Minor weakness at long end
👍 Image quality 5
👍 Build and design 4
👍 Portability 3
👍 Vibration reduction 2
👍 Teleconverter compatibility 2
👍 Versatility 3

Scores

Professional
Canon
92
Nikon
52
Video Cinema
Canon
90
Nikon
54
Portrait
Canon
88
Nikon
37
Travel
Canon
87
Nikon
64
Street
Canon
84
Nikon
45
Wildlife Sports
Canon
82
Nikon
61
Landscape
Canon
80
Nikon
76
Budget
Canon
79
Nikon
63
Macro
Canon
70
Nikon
63

Specifications

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMNikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S 100mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm100 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm400 mm
Elements1425
Groups1120
Aspherical Elements2★—
ED Elements28★
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/40
Min Aperturef/2.84.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.49 kg★1.44 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Autofocus
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops★5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance270 mm★750 mm
Max Magnification0.24x1:2.63★

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S 100mm

  • Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average aperture (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile

Pricing

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM is $1,398 cheaper (2.3x less).

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM0.080score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S 100mm0.025score per dollar

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM offers 3.2x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider