Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
88 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm

Nikon
63 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

90 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design. Users appreciate it as a versatile upgrade from kit lenses, especially for mirrorless cameras like the R7 and R5 Mark II. A single negative review is due to a delivery issue, not product quality.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
  • Versatile for various settings
Cons
  • Possible delivery mismanagement
👍 Image quality 4
👍 Autofocus performance 3
👍 Weight and portability 6
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Versatility 2
👎 Delivery experience 1

Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm

82 out of 100 high confidence 433 reviews

The Nikon 35mm f/1.8 lens is widely praised for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent low-light performance, making it a favorite for street, portrait, and everyday photography. Many users highlight its lightweight build and value for money, though some note that it is not as sharp as the 50mm S lens and can suffer from vignetting and corner softness wide open. A few reviewers also mention quality control issues and a plastic feel, but overall it is considered a solid, versatile prime lens.

Pros
  • Sharp images edge-to-edge
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Excellent low-light performance
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
Cons
  • Vignetting and corner softness wide open
  • Not as sharp as 50mm S lens
  • Plastic build feels cheap
  • Quality control issues reported
  • Overpriced compared to alternatives
👍 Image quality 28
👍 Autofocus performance 15
👍 Low light performance 12
🤔 Build quality 10
👍 Value for money 14
👎 Vignetting and corner sharpness 6

Scores

Professional
Canon
92
Nikon
61
Video Cinema
Canon
90
Nikon
54
Portrait
Canon
88
Nikon
50
Travel
Canon
87
Nikon
63
Street
Canon
84
Nikon
62
Wildlife Sports
Canon
82
Nikon
49
Landscape
Canon
80
Nikon
60
Budget
Canon
79
Nikon
57
Macro
Canon
70
Nikon
64

Specifications

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMNikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm35 mm
Elements148
Groups116
Aspherical Elements2★1
ED Elements22
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)Super Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountCanon RFNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.49 kg0.20 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★Silent Wave Motor
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops★5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance270 mm250 mm★
Max Magnification0.24x1:6.25★

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm is $930 cheaper (6.5x less).

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM0.080score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm0.370score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm offers 4.6x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider