Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
88 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2196 18-300mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2196 18-300mm

Nikon
80 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

90 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design. Users appreciate it as a versatile upgrade from kit lenses, especially for mirrorless cameras like the R7 and R5 Mark II. A single negative review is due to a delivery issue, not product quality.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
  • Versatile for various settings
Cons
  • Possible delivery mismanagement
👍 Image quality 4
👍 Autofocus performance 3
👍 Weight and portability 6
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Versatility 2
👎 Delivery experience 1

Nikon NIKKOR 2196 18-300mm

88 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

The Nikon 18-300mm lens is widely praised for its versatility, replacing multiple lenses with a single 16.7x zoom. Users highlight excellent clarity, fast performance, and effective vibration reduction, though they note it is heavy and expensive. Build quality is solid, and close-focus capability is a bonus. The main drawbacks are weight and the need for a good camera body to balance it.

Pros
  • Excellent clarity and sharpness
  • Fast performance and speed
  • Effective vibration reduction (VR II)
  • Versatile 16.7x zoom range (18-300mm)
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Heavy weight (over 2 lbs)
  • High price
  • No tripod mount on lens
  • Requires good camera body for balance
  • Large filter size (77mm) increases cost
👍 Image quality 5
👍 Versatility 4
👎 Weight 4
👍 Vibration reduction 3
👍 Build quality 3
👎 Price 3

Scores

Professional
Canon
92
Nikon
57
Video Cinema
Canon
90
Nikon
63
Portrait
Canon
88
Nikon
77
Travel
Canon
87
Nikon
57
Street
Canon
84
Nikon
63
Wildlife Sports
Canon
82
Nikon
52
Landscape
Canon
80
Nikon
61
Budget
Canon
79
Nikon
77
Macro
Canon
70
Nikon
71

Specifications

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMNikon NIKKOR 2196 18-300mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm300 mm
Elements1419
Groups1114
Aspherical Elements2★—
ED Elements2★—
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-5.6
Constant✓★✗
Build
MountCanon RFNikon F
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.49 kg★0.83 kg
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★AF-S
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance270 mm★300 mm
Max Magnification0.24x★—

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR 2196 18-300mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (8th percentile)8th %ile

Pricing

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM is $201 cheaper (1.2x less).

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM0.080score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2196 18-300mm0.062score per dollar

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM offers 1.3x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR 2196 18-300mm

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Better at:

StreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider