Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
88 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

Tamron
60 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

90 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM lens receives overwhelmingly positive feedback for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and lightweight design. Users appreciate it as a versatile upgrade from kit lenses, especially for mirrorless cameras like the R7 and R5 Mark II. A single negative review is due to a delivery issue, not product quality.

Pros
  • Sharp image quality
  • Fast and accurate autofocus
  • Lightweight and compact design
  • Great value for the price
  • Versatile for various settings
Cons
  • Possible delivery mismanagement
👍 Image quality 4
👍 Autofocus performance 3
👍 Weight and portability 6
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Versatility 2
👎 Delivery experience 1

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

78 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews

The Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 lens is praised for its sharpness, good build quality, and excellent value compared to pricier Canon alternatives. Users highlight its lightweight design and suitability for landscape, architectural, and real estate photography. However, some note issues like lack of vibration control, a loose manual focus ring, and occasional camera crashes with certain bodies. Overall, it's a solid budget-friendly ultrawide zoom with minor drawbacks.

Pros
  • Sharp corner to corner
  • Excellent value for money
  • Lightweight and portable
  • Good build quality
  • Fast and quiet autofocus
Cons
  • No vibration control
  • Loose manual focus ring
  • Occasional camera crashes with some bodies
  • Less vibrant color than primes
  • Zoom ring can be stiff
👍 Sharpness 5
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Build quality 3
👍 Weight and portability 3
👍 Autofocus performance 3
👎 Vibration control 2

Scores

Professional
Canon
92
Tamron
55
Video Cinema
Canon
90
Tamron
53
Portrait
Canon
88
Tamron
62
Travel
Canon
87
Tamron
60
Street
Canon
84
Tamron
57
Wildlife Sports
Canon
82
Tamron
55
Landscape
Canon
80
Tamron
55
Budget
Canon
79
Tamron
58
Macro
Canon
70
Tamron
61

Specifications

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMTamron Di A037 17-35mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min28 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm35 mm
Elements14—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements2★—
ED Elements2★—
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)fluorine compound
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.82.8-4
Constant✓★✗
Build
MountCanon RFCanon EF
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.49 kg0.46 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM★OSD
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance270 mm★280 mm
Max Magnification0.24x★—

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong aperture (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm

  • Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (74th percentile)
  • Strong macro (72nd percentile)
  • Strong aperture (71st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm is $880 cheaper (5.0x less).

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM0.080score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di A037 17-35mm0.274score per dollar

Tamron Di A037 17-35mm offers 3.4x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider