Laowa Zero-D 17mm f/4 Zero-D Shift 17mm
Laowa
46 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Laowa Zero-D 17mm f/4 Zero-D Shift 17mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 17 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 18 | 17 |
| Groups | 12 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 14★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | L-Mount |
| Format | Full-Frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.77 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 86 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Manual Focus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Pros & Cons
Laowa Zero-D 17mm f/4 Zero-D Shift 17mm
- Strong bokeh (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong macro (78th percentile)
- Strong aperture (70th percentile)
- Strong optical (69th percentile)
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average build (26th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Pricing
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
