Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mm
Leica
59 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 18 | 13 |
| Groups | 12 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 3 | 3 |
| Coating | Multi-layer coatings, AquaDura coating | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-4.5 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.99 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.27x | 1:5.26★ |
Pros & Cons
Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mm
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 11177 16-35mm0.009score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 9.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
