Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Sigma
73 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Nikon
90 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Street
Landscape
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Macro
Specifications
| Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 19 |
| Groups | 10 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| Coating | wasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches Glas | ARNEO and Nano Crystal Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 4-6.3 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.57 kg |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm | 500 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.28x★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
Pricing
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B00.322score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR0.123score per dollar
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 offers 2.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Scores 90 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
