FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

FotoZ
74 Overall Score
vs
HOLGA HL-C 60mm

HOLGA HL-C 60mm

HOLGA
41 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
FotoZ
89
HOLGA
26
Street
FotoZ
71
HOLGA
48
Budget
FotoZ
68
HOLGA
44
Travel
FotoZ
65
HOLGA
44
Portrait
FotoZ
60
HOLGA
41
Video Cinema
FotoZ
60
HOLGA
47
Landscape
FotoZ
59
HOLGA
33
Professional
FotoZ
55
HOLGA
40
Wildlife Sports
FotoZ
55
HOLGA
34

Specifications

FotoZ KZ-03 24mmHOLGA HL-C 60mm
Optics
Typewide-anglestandard
Focal Length Min16 mm60 mm
Focal Length Max24 mm60 mm
Coatingnano-coatings—
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/8
Min Aperture—f/8
Constant—✓★
Build
MountSony ENikon F
Weight0.12 kg0.03 kg★
Filter Thread41 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—manual focus only
Stabilization✓✓
Focus
Min Focus Distance16 mm★—
Max Magnification10X★—

Pros & Cons

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

  • Strong macro (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (68th percentile)

HOLGA HL-C 60mm

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

HOLGA HL-C 60mm is $26 cheaper (2.3x less).

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm1.607score per dollar
vs
HOLGA HL-C 60mm2.046score per dollar

HOLGA HL-C 60mm offers 1.3x better value for money

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

HOLGA HL-C 60mm

Verdict

★ Winner: FotoZ KZ-03 24mm

Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 14 specs.

FotoZ KZ-03 24mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider