Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM

Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM

Sony
66 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sony
46
Sigma
86
Street
Sony
56
Sigma
86
Macro
Sony
37
Sigma
82
Portrait
Sony
59
Sigma
81
Travel
Sony
56
Sigma
80
Budget
Sony
66
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
Sony
53
Sigma
74
Landscape
Sony
45
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Sony
57
Sigma
66

Specifications

Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAMSigma 207975
Optics
Typetelephotowide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min55 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm18 mm
Elements13
Groups10
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/2.8
Min Aperture4-5.6f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony ASony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.31 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSAMAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance950 mm117 mm
Max Magnification0.29x1:4

Pros & Cons

Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM

  • Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Pricing

Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM is $335 cheaper (2.6x less).

Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM0.319score per dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.158score per dollar

Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM offers 2.0x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider