Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Beyerdynamic
89 Overall Score
vs
Sennheiser RS 255
Sennheiser
44 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
No customer feedback yet
Sennheiser RS 255
88 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews
The Sennheiser RS 255 wireless TV headphones receive overwhelmingly positive feedback for their excellent sound quality, low latency, and comfortable design. Users highlight the convenience of private listening without disturbing others, long battery life, and the effective Auracast technology. A few concerns about thin padding and cramped ear cups are noted, but overall it is praised as a high-quality, immersive audio solution for TV and movies.
Pros
- Excellent sound quality
- Low latency for lip-sync
- Comfortable for long sessions
- Long battery life
- Easy setup and use
Cons
- Thin padding on headband
- Cramped ear cups for some
- Expensive price point
- Not noise-cancelling
Sound quality 8
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Latency 4
Ease of use 4
Build quality 3
Scores
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Specifications
| Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 | Sennheiser RS 255 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | — |
| Foldable | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.22 kg | 0.20 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | replaceable ear pads | plush |
| Headband | aluminum and durable textiles | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 45 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 48 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC | Sennheiser RS 255 TV Headphones - Bluetooth Headphones and Transmitter Bundle - Low Latency Wireless Headphones with Virtual Surround Sound, Speech Clarity and Auracast Technology - 50 h Battery |
| Surround | — | Sennheiser RS 255 TV Headphones - Bluetooth Headphones and Transmitter Bundle - Low Latency Wireless Headphones with Virtual Surround Sound, Speech Clarity and Auracast Technology - 50 h Battery | Sen |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Profiles | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 | — |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | — |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | — |
| Range | 15 m★ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 60 hrs★ | 50 hrs |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Capacity | 630 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| Mic Count | 2★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | — |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Fast Pair | — |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | — |
| App | beyerdynamic app | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Sennheiser RS 255
- Strong user sentiment (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong connectivity (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong battery (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong comfort (67th percentile)
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average sound (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Pricing
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1000.636score per dollar
vs
Sennheiser RS 2550.156score per dollar
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 offers 4.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 40 specs.
