Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Beyerdynamic
89 Overall Score
vs
Focal Bathys
Focal
76 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
No customer feedback yet
Focal Bathys
78 out of 100 medium confidence 14 reviews
The Focal Bathys are widely praised for their exceptional sound quality, which rivals wired audiophile headphones, especially in Bluetooth mode. Users highlight the warm, detailed audio, effective EQ customization, and comfortable fit, though some note the ANC is not top-tier and the lack of a passive mode is a drawback. A few reviewers mention durability concerns, such as driver rattling after two years, and the heavy weight can cause fit issues for some. Overall, they are seen as a top choice for audiophiles seeking wireless convenience.
Pros
- Exceptional sound quality
- Warm and detailed audio
- Effective EQ customization
- Comfortable for long wear
- Built-in DAC mode
Cons
- ANC not top-tier
- No passive mode
- Heavy weight
- Large volume steps
- No LDAC or aptX HD
Sound quality 12
Anc performance 7
Comfort and fit 8
Build quality 6
Battery life 4
Eq and app 6
Scores
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Specifications
| Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 | Focal Bathys | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.22 kg★ | 0.35 kg |
| Ear Cushion | replaceable ear pads | real leather and microfiber |
| Headband | aluminum and durable textiles | real leather and microfiber |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 45 mm★ | 40 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 15 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 48 Ω | 80 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | Adaptive | Silent/Soft |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.1 |
| Profiles | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | — | 1.2000000476837158 m |
| Range | 15 m | 15 m |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 60 hrs★ | 30 hrs |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time | 15 Minutes for 5 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | 630 mAh | 1,060 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 2 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Fast Pair | Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | beyerdynamic app | Focal & Naim |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
Pros & Cons
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Focal Bathys
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong anc (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong battery (77th percentile)
- Below average comfort (15th percentile)15th %ile
Pricing
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1000.635score per dollar
vs
Focal Bathys0.128score per dollar
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 offers 5.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 5 of 40 specs.
