Bose QuietComfort Ultra 880066-0100

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 880066-0100

Bose
55 Overall Score
vs
Poly Blackwire 8225

Poly Blackwire 8225

Poly
42 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
Bose
56
Poly
65
Work
Bose
60
Poly
47
Budget
Bose
60
Poly
44
Calls
Bose
57
Poly
46
Commute
Bose
47
Poly
42
Music
Bose
40
Poly
38
Studio
Bose
28
Poly
38

Specifications

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 880066-0100Poly Blackwire 8225
Design
Form Factorover-earover-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Weight0.19 kg
Ear Cushionartificial leather
Audio
Driver Size32 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity84 dB
CodecsAAC
Surround7.1 Virtual Surround
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorUSB-C
Detachable Cable
Cable Length2.190000057220459 m
Battery
Battery Life24 hrs
Charge Time4 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 5 hours playback
ChargingUSB-C
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google Assistant
Touch Controls
AppBose MusicPoly Lens

Pros & Cons

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 880066-0100

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong mic (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong anc (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average comfort (32nd percentile)

Poly Blackwire 8225

  • Strong mic (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong comfort (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong anc (85th percentile)85th %ile

Pricing

Poly Blackwire 8225 is $111 cheaper (1.7x less).

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 880066-01000.204score per dollar
vs
Poly Blackwire 82250.265score per dollar

Poly Blackwire 8225 offers 1.3x better value for money

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 880066-0100

Poly Blackwire 8225

Verdict

Winner: Bose QuietComfort Ultra 880066-0100

Scores 55 overall, wins 4 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 31 specs.

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 880066-0100 Better at:

WorkCallsBudgetCommute

Poly Blackwire 8225 Better at:

GamingStudio

Also Consider