JVC HARX500
JVC
47 Overall Score
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Beyerdynamic
89 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
JVC HARX500
85 out of 100 low confidence 9 reviews
Users consistently praise the JVC HA-RX500 headphones for their exceptional value at around $18, highlighting comfortable oversized ear pads and clear sound quality. A few note the very long 11-foot cord as either a pro or con depending on use, and one long-term owner reports they lasted over six years with minor repairs. Overall, buyers find them a reliable budget choice for everyday listening.
Pros
- Exceptional value for under $18
- Comfortable oversized ear pads
- Clear sound quality
- Long 11-foot cord
- Durable build lasting 6+ years
Cons
- Very long cord may be excessive for some
- Top padding can irritate bald users
- Sliding sides may detach over time
- Connector may wear out
- Not suitable for headphone amplifier use
Value for money 5
Comfort 4
Sound quality 4
Cord length 3
Build quality 3
Durability 2
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Commute
Music
Studio
Gaming
Work
Calls
Specifications
| JVC HARX500 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.40 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | cushioned | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | cushioned | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 40 mm | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 10 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 70 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 3.5 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 60 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15-minute charge for up to 15 hours of listening time |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | Water-Resistant | — |
Pros & Cons
JVC HARX500
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong sound (77th percentile)
- Strong user sentiment (72nd percentile)
- Below average comfort (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
Pricing
JVC HARX5001.671score per dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1000.636score per dollar
JVC HARX500 offers 2.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 42 specs.
