Glynzak Wireless

Glynzak Wireless

Glynzak
68 Overall Score
vs
Maxell 199845

Maxell 199845

Maxell
14 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Glynzak
72
Maxell
16
Gaming
Glynzak
63
Maxell
17
Music
Glynzak
60
Maxell
11
Studio
Glynzak
59
Maxell
12
Work
Glynzak
50
Maxell
12
Commute
Glynzak
48
Maxell
9
Calls
Glynzak
41
Maxell
12

Specifications

Glynzak WirelessMaxell 199845
Design
Form Factorover-earon-ear
Foldable
Weight0.28 kg
Ear CushionPU artificial leatherpadded
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size40 mm
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity80 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAndroid Phone Control, Lightweight, Microphone Included, Volume Control, iOS Phone Control
Noise Control
ANC
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Cable Length1.8287999629974365 m
Battery
Battery Life65 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
ChargingUSB-C
Capacity500 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Features
Touch Controls
AppiOS, Android

Pros & Cons

Glynzak Wireless

  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong battery (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Maxell 199845

  • Below average sound (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
  • Below average social proof (31st percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Maxell 199845 is $8 cheaper (1.8x less).

Glynzak Wireless3.763score per dollar
vs
Maxell 1998451.355score per dollar

Glynzak Wireless offers 2.8x better value for money

Glynzak Wireless

Maxell 199845

Verdict

Winner: Glynzak Wireless

Scores 68 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 26 specs.

Glynzak Wireless Better at:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Also Consider