JVC HAF160B Gumy Ear Bud Headphone
JVC
13 Overall Score
vs
Glynzak Wireless
Glynzak
69 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Music
Studio
Work
Commute
Calls
Specifications
| JVC HAF160B Gumy Ear Bud Headphone | Glynzak Wireless | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | — | over-ear |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.28 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | PU artificial leather |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 80 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | Android Phone Control, Lightweight, Microphone Included, Volume Control, iOS Phone Control |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 65 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 500 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | iOS, Android |
Pros & Cons
JVC HAF160B Gumy Ear Bud Headphone
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average connectivity (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average mic (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average sound (24th percentile)
- Below average anc (33rd percentile)
Glynzak Wireless
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong battery (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average anc (33rd percentile)
Pricing
JVC HAF160B Gumy Ear Bud Headphone1.546score per dollar
vs
Glynzak Wireless3.835score per dollar
Glynzak Wireless offers 2.5x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Glynzak Wireless
Scores 69 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 25 specs.
