Focal Celestee FCELESTEE

Focal Celestee FCELESTEE

Focal
47 Overall Score
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

Beyerdynamic
80 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Focal Celestee FCELESTEE

92 out of 100 low confidence 6 reviews

The Focal Celestee headphones receive overwhelmingly positive feedback from verified buyers, who praise their exceptional sound clarity, detail retrieval, and balanced frequency response. Users report rediscovering music with newfound nuances, though some note the need for a DAC to unlock full potential and mention the short included cable as a minor drawback.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound clarity and detail
  • Balanced frequency response
  • Comfortable fit
  • Beautiful design
  • Reveals new nuances in familiar music
Cons
  • Short included cable
  • Requires DAC for full potential
  • High price point
👍 Sound quality 6
👍 Detail retrieval 5
👍 Build quality 3
👍 Comfort 2
👎 Cable length 2
🤔 Dac requirement 2

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

78 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

These headphones are praised for their analytical sound, exceptional separation, and bass texture, especially with aptX lossless codecs. However, they are not recommended for casual listening or movies due to a fatiguing and unforgiving sound signature. Battery life and low latency are appreciated, but the soundstage can feel flat on grand orchestral pieces.

Pros
  • Exceptional separation and resolution
  • Rich bass texture
  • Low latency with Bluetooth
  • Great with aptX lossless codecs
  • Excellent for electronic music
Cons
  • Fatiguing for movies and casual listening
  • Flat soundstage on grand orchestral pieces
  • Requires aptX-compatible source for best sound
👍 Sound quality 2
🤔 Analytical sound signature 2
👍 Battery life 1
👍 Latency 1
👍 Codec support 1
👎 Comfort for casual use 1

Scores

Music
Focal
49
Beyerdynamic
88
Gaming
Focal
36
Beyerdynamic
87
Studio
Focal
51
Beyerdynamic
87
Budget
Focal
58
Beyerdynamic
86
Work
Focal
30
Beyerdynamic
78
Commute
Focal
31
Beyerdynamic
74
Calls
Focal
19
Beyerdynamic
68

Specifications

Focal Celestee FCELESTEEBeyerdynamic Aventho 300
Design
Form Factorover-earover-ear
Open/Closedclosedclosed
Foldable—✓★
Weight0.16 kg★0.32 kg
Ear Cushionsemi-aniline leathermemory foam
Headbandleather on the outside with microfiber on the insidememory foam
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size40 mm45 mm★
Drivers—1★
Freq Min—5 Hz★
Freq Max23 kHz★22 kHz
Impedance35 Ω32 Ω
Hi-Res Audio—✓★
Codecs—AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive
Surround—Dolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC—✓★
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless—✓★
Bluetooth—5.4★
Profiles—AVDTP, AVDTP, GAVDP, SPP, A2DP, AVRCP, HFP
Multipoint—✓★
Wired Connector—3.5mm
Detachable Cable—✓★
Range—15 m★
Battery
Battery Life—50 hrs★
Charge Time—2 hrs★
Fast Charging—10 Minutes for 5 Hours
Charging—USB-C★
Microphone
Microphone—✓★
Mic Count—6★
NC Mic—✗
Boom Mic—✗
Detachable Mic—✗
Features
Voice Assistant—Dolby Head Tracking Technology
Touch Controls—✗
App—Beyerdynamic
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode—✓★

Pros & Cons

Focal Celestee FCELESTEE

  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong comfort (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (69th percentile)
  • Strong sound (66th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average mic (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong battery (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 is $799 cheaper (5.0x less).

Focal Celestee FCELESTEE0.047score per dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 3000.402score per dollar

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 offers 8.6x better value for money

Focal Celestee FCELESTEE

Verdict

★ Winner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 300

Scores 80 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 39 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 300 Better at:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

Also Consider