ASRock Radeon RX 6400 Challenger 4GB GDDR6
ASRock
33 Overall Score
vs
ASUS GeForce RTX 5090 TUF Gaming 32GB GDDR7 Black
ASUS
100 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
ASRock Radeon RX 6400 Challenger 4GB GDDR6
No customer feedback yet
ASUS GeForce RTX 5090 TUF Gaming 32GB GDDR7 Black
88 out of 100 high confidence 31 reviews
The ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5090 garners overwhelmingly positive feedback for its top-tier performance, robust build quality, and effective cooling system. Reviewers consistently praise its ability to handle 4K gaming and creative workloads like Blender and AI rendering with ease, thanks to its 32GB of VRAM. While many users highlight the quiet operation and included GPU sag holder, they also acknowledge the high price and power requirements. The card's large physical size is a frequent note, requiring ample case space and a strong PSU.
Pros
- Excellent 4K gaming performance
- 32 GB GDDR7 VRAM for heavy workloads
- Robust cooling with low noise
- Solid build quality with industrial design
- Included GPU sag holder
Cons
- Very high price point
- Large physical size requires spacious case
- High power consumption and PSU requirements
- Plastic outer shroud instead of metal
- Coil whine under extreme load
4k gaming performance 10
Cooling and noise 9
Build quality 8
Value for money 8
Power consumption 5
Physical size 6
Scores
Gaming 4k
Ray Tracing
Gaming 1440p
Gaming 1080p
Ai Llm
Content Creation
Workstation
Budget
Specifications
| ASRock Radeon RX 6400 Challenger | ASUS GeForce RTX 5090 TUF Gaming | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Radeon RX 6400 | GeForce RTX 5090 |
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Blackwell |
| Class | consumer | consumer |
| Process | 6★ | — |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 4 GB | 32 GB★ |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7★ |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | No data | |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Compute | ||
| CUDA Cores | No data | |
| Stream Processors | No data | |
| RT Cores | 12★ | — |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 7.130000114440918★ | — |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 3.565000057220459★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 53★ | 575 |
| Recommended PSU | 350★ | 1,000 |
| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-Pin PCI Connector |
| Cooler | Single Fan | Triple Fan★ |
| Fans | 1 | 3★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 4.0 | PCI Express 4.0 x16 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 3★ |
| HDMI | 1 | 2★ |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4★ |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 | 7680 x 4320 |
| Physical | ||
| Length | 162★ | 348 |
| Slot Width | 2★ | 3.5999999046325684 |
| Form Factor | ITX | Full Height |
| Weight | 0.28 kg★ | 2.37 kg |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Upscaling | AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution | DLSS 4.0 |
| AV1 Encode | — | ✓★ |
| VR Ready | — | ✓★ |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| RGB | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
ASRock Radeon RX 6400 Challenger 4GB GDDR6
- Strong efficiency (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (76th percentile)
- Strong affordability (70th percentile)
- Below average compute (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average ai (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average vram (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average raster (20th percentile)20th %ile
ASUS GeForce RTX 5090 TUF Gaming 32GB GDDR7 Black
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong raster (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong vram (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average efficiency (27th percentile)
Pricing
ASRock Radeon RX 6400 Challenger 4GB GDDR60.092score per dollar
vs
ASUS GeForce RTX 5090 TUF Gaming 32GB GDDR7 Black0.035score per dollar
ASRock Radeon RX 6400 Challenger 4GB GDDR6 offers 2.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: ASUS GeForce RTX 5090 TUF Gaming
Scores 100 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 16 of 39 specs.
