XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster 8GB GDDR6
XFX
53 Overall Score
vs
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
Lenovo
25 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster 8GB GDDR6
78 out of 100 medium confidence 18 reviews
The RX 7600 is generally well-received as a budget-friendly GPU that delivers solid 1080p performance, especially with AMD's FSR and frame generation tech. Users praise its price-to-performance ratio, compact size, low power draw, and quiet operation. However, a few report issues like random crashes, driver compatibility problems, and one unit dying after four months, which temper the overall enthusiasm.
Pros
- Great price-to-performance ratio
- Excellent 1080p gaming performance
- Compact size fits small cases
- Low power draw
- Quiet operation
Cons
- Random crashes reported
- Driver compatibility issues
- One unit died after 4 months
- Large size for some cases
- AMD software issues
Performance 12
Value for money 8
Build quality 5
Reliability 4
Driver compatibility 3
Noise level 3
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Gaming 1080p
Ray Tracing
Gaming 1440p
Content Creation
Workstation
Gaming 4k
Ai Llm
Specifications
| XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster | Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Radeon RX 7600 | Quadro NVS 510 |
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | RDNA 3 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Class | consumer | workstation |
| Process | 6 | 5★ |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 8 GB★ | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| Stream Processors | No data | |
| Tensor Cores | 64★ | — |
| RT Cores | 32 | 54★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 43.5 | 55.29999923706055★ |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 21.75 | 27.649999618530273★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 165 | 35★ |
| Recommended PSU | 550 | 450★ |
| Power Connectors | 8-Pin | — |
| Cooler | Dual Fan★ | Fan |
| Fans | 2★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 4.0 x8 | — |
| DisplayPort | 3★ | 1 |
| HDMI | 1★ | — |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 | — |
| Physical | ||
| Length | 241★ | — |
| Slot Width | 2★ | — |
| Form Factor | ATX | Low Profile |
| Weight | 1.07 kg | 0.10 kg★ |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Upscaling | FSR | — |
| AV1 Encode | ✓★ | — |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | — |
| RGB | ✗ | — |
Pros & Cons
XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster 8GB GDDR6
- Strong affordability (76th percentile)
- Strong social proof (76th percentile)
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
- Strong connectivity (71st percentile)
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Strong compute (66th percentile)
- Below average raster (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average feature (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average efficiency (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average vram (15th percentile)15th %ile
Pricing
XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster 8GB GDDR60.175score per dollar
vs
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation0.384score per dollar
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation offers 2.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: XFX Radeon RX 7600 Speedster
Scores 53 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 15 of 37 specs.
