ASRock Arc B570 Challenger 10GB GDDR6 Black
ASRock
53 Overall Score
vs
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
Lenovo
25 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
ASRock Arc B570 Challenger 10GB GDDR6 Black
78 out of 100 medium confidence 26 reviews
The ASRock Challenger Arc B570 is widely praised as a great budget 1440p GPU, offering excellent value, cool and quiet operation, and easy installation. Users upgrading from older cards like the GTX 1060 or RTX 2060 report significant performance gains, though some note stuttering in certain games and a known CPU overhead issue. A few negative reviews focus on price increases from MSRP and a vague one-star complaint, but the overall sentiment is strongly positive.
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Cool and quiet operation
- Easy installation
- Great 1440p performance
- Good upgrade from older GPUs
Cons
- Price increased from MSRP
- CPU overhead issue with older CPUs
- Stuttering in some games
- VRAM limit can be hit
- Driver issues with older games
Value for money 7
Cooling and noise 5
Installation ease 4
1440p performance 4
Cpu overhead issue 3
Pricing concerns 2
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Budget
Gaming 1080p
Gaming 1440p
Ray Tracing
Gaming 4k
Content Creation
Workstation
Ai Llm
Specifications
| ASRock Arc B570 Challenger | Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Arc B570 | Quadro NVS 510 |
| Brand | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Xe2-HPG (Battlemage) | RDNA 3.0 |
| Class | consumer | workstation |
| Process | — | 5★ |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 10 GB★ | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | No data | |
| Compute | ||
| RT Cores | — | 54★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | — | 55.29999923706055★ |
| FP32 TFLOPS | — | 27.649999618530273★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | ||
| GPU Compute | ||
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 150 | 35★ |
| Recommended PSU | 600 | 450★ |
| Power Connectors | 8-Pin | — |
| Cooler | Dual Fan★ | Fan |
| Fans | 2★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 4.0 | — |
| DisplayPort | 3★ | 1 |
| HDMI | 1★ | — |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 8K (4320p) | — |
| Physical | ||
| Length | 132★ | — |
| Slot Width | 2★ | — |
| Form Factor | ATX | Low Profile |
| Weight | 0.72 kg | 0.10 kg★ |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Upscaling | XeSS | — |
| AV1 Encode | ✓★ | — |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | — |
| RGB | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
ASRock Arc B570 Challenger 10GB GDDR6 Black
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong connectivity (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong feature (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong affordability (78th percentile)
- Below average compute (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average raster (33rd percentile)
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation
- Strong affordability (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Strong compute (66th percentile)
- Below average raster (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average feature (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average efficiency (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average vram (15th percentile)15th %ile
Pricing
ASRock Arc B570 Challenger 10GB GDDR6 Black0.191score per dollar
vs
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation0.384score per dollar
Lenovo Quadro NVS 510 2GB workstation offers 2.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: ASRock Arc B570 Challenger
Scores 53 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 14 of 35 specs.
