Sapphire Radeon RX 7800 XT PULSE 16GB GDDR6
Sapphire
75 Overall Score
vs
PNY Quadro NVS 510 2GB DDR3 workstation
PNY
22 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Sapphire Radeon RX 7800 XT PULSE 16GB GDDR6
No customer feedback yet
PNY Quadro NVS 510 2GB DDR3 workstation
72 out of 100 medium confidence 11 reviews
The NVIDIA NVS 510 is generally well-regarded for multi-monitor business use, with users praising its ability to drive four displays and its value for the price. Common issues include missing adapter cables or documentation, occasional incompatibility with certain systems like the HP Envy, and a zoom virtual background limitation. Despite these problems, many find it stable and effective for office applications, video editing, and stock trading.
Pros
- Drives four monitors effortlessly
- Great value for the price
- Stable performance for office apps
- Includes mini-DP to DP adapters
- Easy installation
Cons
- Missing adapter cables from some shipments
- Does not work with HP Envy systems
- Zoom virtual background not supported
- Incompatible with older motherboard RAM
- Incomplete documentation on CD
Multi monitor support 5
Value for money 4
Missing accessories 3
System compatibility 2
Installation difficulty 2
Gaming unsuitability 2
Scores
Budget
Ray Tracing
Gaming 1080p
Gaming 1440p
Content Creation
Gaming 4k
Workstation
Ai Llm
Specifications
| Sapphire Radeon RX 7800 XT PULSE | PNY Quadro NVS 510 | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | Radeon RX 7800 XT | Quadro NVS 510 |
| Brand | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | RDNA 3 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Class | consumer | workstation |
| Process | 5 | 5 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 16 GB★ | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6★ | DDR3 |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| CUDA Cores | No data | |
| Stream Processors | No data | |
| Tensor Cores | No data | |
| RT Cores | 60★ | 54 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 74.6500015258789★ | 55.29999923706055 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 37.31999969482422★ | 27.649999618530273 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | No data | |
| GPU Compute | No data | |
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 263★ | 295 |
| Recommended PSU | 700 | 450★ |
| Power Connectors | 2 x 8 pin | None |
| Cooler | Dual Fan★ | Passive |
| Fans | 2★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 4.0 x16 | PCI Express x16 |
| DisplayPort | 2 | 4★ |
| HDMI | 2★ | 0 |
| USB-C | 0★ | — |
| Max Displays | 4★ | — |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 | 3840x2160 |
| Physical | ||
| Length | 280 | 160★ |
| Slot Width | 2.5 | 1★ |
| Form Factor | ATX | Low Profile |
| Weight | 1.50 kg | 0.21 kg★ |
| Features | ||
| Ray Tracing | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Upscaling | FSR | None |
| AV1 Encode | ✓★ | ✗ |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| RGB | ✓★ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Sapphire Radeon RX 7800 XT PULSE 16GB GDDR6
- Strong connectivity (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong feature (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong ai (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
PNY Quadro NVS 510 2GB DDR3 workstation
- Strong affordability (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average raster (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average vram (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average thermal (15th percentile)15th %ile
Pricing
Sapphire Radeon RX 7800 XT PULSE 16GB GDDR60.124score per dollar
vs
PNY Quadro NVS 510 2GB DDR3 workstation0.231score per dollar
PNY Quadro NVS 510 2GB DDR3 workstation offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sapphire Radeon RX 7800 XT PULSE
Scores 75 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 22 of 39 specs.
