Nothing Ear (3)

Nothing Ear (3)

Nothing
88 Overall Score
vs
Bowers & Wilkins FP43796

Bowers & Wilkins FP43796

Bowers & Wilkins
14 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
Nothing
89
Bowers & Wilkins
6
Budget
Nothing
85
Bowers & Wilkins
19
Fitness
Nothing
81
Bowers & Wilkins
8
Calls
Nothing
77
Bowers & Wilkins
6
Commute
Nothing
76
Bowers & Wilkins
10
Travel
Nothing
76
Bowers & Wilkins
12
Music
Nothing
75
Bowers & Wilkins
14

Specifications

Nothing Ear (3)Bowers & Wilkins FP43796
Design
Form Factorin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsSmall, Medium, Large
Weight0.01 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size12 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity108 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
SurroundSimulated Surround, Stereo
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10.100000381469727 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life10 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs
Fast Charging5
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery19 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantAmazon Alexa, Google Home, Apple Home, SmartThings
Touch Controls
AppNothing X
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWater-Resistant

Pros & Cons

Nothing Ear (3)

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong sound (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Bowers & Wilkins FP43796

  • Below average social proof (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)

Pricing

Nothing Ear (3) is $270 cheaper (3.1x less).

Nothing Ear (3)0.684score per dollar
vs
Bowers & Wilkins FP437960.034score per dollar

Nothing Ear (3) offers 20.1x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Nothing Ear (3)

Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 24 of 37 specs.

Nothing Ear (3) Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider