Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score
vs
Google Pixel Buds A-Series

Google Pixel Buds A-Series

Google
61 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional sound quality, with users highlighting deep bass, clear highs, and immersive audio. Comfort, battery life, and noise cancellation are also frequently commended, though some users note the price is high and volume could be louder. A few minor issues like Bluetooth LE disconnects and initial multi-device pairing were mentioned, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality
  • Deep immersive bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • Limited maximum volume
  • Bluetooth LE disconnects
  • Initial multi-device pairing issues
  • Plastic exterior
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

Google Pixel Buds A-Series

86 out of 100 medium confidence 13 reviews

The Google Pixel Buds A-Series have received largely positive feedback from users, who praise their good sound quality, comfortable fit, and seamless connectivity, especially with Pixel phones. However, some users have noted a relatively short battery life of 3-4 hours and occasional charging issues due to poor contact with the charging pins. Overall, they are considered a great value for budget-conscious buyers, particularly those commuting or using them for calls and media.

Pros
  • Good sound quality
  • Comfortable fit
  • Seamless connectivity
  • Quick device switching
  • Fast charging
Cons
  • Short battery life (3-4 hours)
  • Charging pin contact issues
  • Occasional ear discomfort
  • No volume control on buds
👍 Sound quality 4
🤔 Comfort 3
🤔 Battery life 3
👍 Connectivity 3
👎 Charging issues 2
👍 Value for money 2

Scores

Budget
Technics
99
Google
65
Travel
Technics
95
Google
41
Calls
Technics
93
Google
39
Commute
Technics
90
Google
39
Music
Technics
90
Google
44
Gaming
Technics
88
Google
50
Fitness
Technics
80
Google
55

Specifications

Technics EAH-AZ100Google Pixel Buds A-Series
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear Tips5 x Eartip PairsSmall, Medium, Large
Weight0.05 kg★0.05 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm12 mm★
Drivers1★—
Freq Min20 Hz★—
Freq Max40 kHz★—
Impedance16 Ω1 Ω
Hi-Res Audio✓★—
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC—
SurroundDolby Atmos—
Noise Control
ANC✓★✗
ANC Typeadaptive—
Transparency✓★✗
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.3★5.0
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP—
Multipoint✓★✗
Wired ConnectorBluetooth—
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs★5 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs★—
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playbackNot stated
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs★24 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging✓★✗
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count6★—
NC Mic✓✓
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, SiriGoogle Assistant
Touch Controls✓✓
AppAndroid & iOS—
Volume Limiting✗—
Gaming Mode✗✗
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water ResistanceIPX4IPX4

Pros & Cons

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Google Pixel Buds A-Series

  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)

Pricing

Google Pixel Buds A-Series is $161 cheaper (3.2x less).

Technics EAH-AZ1000.426score per dollar
vs
Google Pixel Buds A-Series0.824score per dollar

Google Pixel Buds A-Series offers 1.9x better value for money

Google Pixel Buds A-Series

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider