TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
83 Overall Score
vs
Google

Google

Google
36 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
TOZO
82
Google
47
Gaming
TOZO
79
Google
32
Travel
TOZO
76
Google
26
Fitness
TOZO
73
Google
28
Commute
TOZO
70
Google
25
Calls
TOZO
69
Google
22
Music
TOZO
69
Google
35

Specifications

TOZO Crystal PodsGoogle
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesshalf-in-ear
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg0.02 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm14.199999809265137 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Pros & Cons

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong build (91th percentile)91th %ile

Google

  • Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong social proof (76th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (21th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)
  • Below average mic (34th percentile)

Pricing

Google is $13 cheaper (1.8x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods2.764score per dollar
vs
Google2.113score per dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods offers 1.3x better value for money

TOZO Crystal Pods

Google

Verdict

Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 83 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 36 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider