TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Overall Score
vs
Samsung 880609067761

Samsung 880609067761

Samsung
43 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
TOZO
80
Samsung
39
Budget
TOZO
80
Samsung
56
Travel
TOZO
78
Samsung
31
Fitness
TOZO
72
Samsung
30
Calls
TOZO
70
Samsung
31
Commute
TOZO
70
Samsung
29
Music
TOZO
68
Samsung
42

Specifications

TOZO Crystal PodsSamsung 880609067761
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessear-tip
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamichybrid
Driver Size10 mm8 mm
Drivers2
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACTangle-Free Cord, In-line Remote
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Pros & Cons

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Samsung 880609067761

  • Strong sound (79th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
  • Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Pricing

Samsung 880609067761 is $3 cheaper (1.3x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods5.239score per dollar
vs
Samsung 8806090677613.331score per dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods offers 1.6x better value for money

Samsung 880609067761

Verdict

Winner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 37 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider