JVC Gumy HAF160B

JVC Gumy HAF160B

JVC
24 Overall Score
vs
JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab
86 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
JVC
16
JLab
84
Commute
JVC
17
JLab
81
Travel
JVC
18
JLab
78
Budget
JVC
34
JLab
78
Fitness
JVC
14
JLab
78
Calls
JVC
10
JLab
77
Music
JVC
28
JLab
69

Specifications

JVC Gumy HAF160BJLab Jbuds Pods ANC
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-tipstem
Ear Tips—S, M, L
Weight—0.12 kg★
Audio
Driver Typeneodymiumdynamic
Driver Size13.5 mm★11 mm
Drivers—1★
Freq Min15 Hz★20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity108 dB★—
Hi-Res Audio✗✗
CodecsJVC HA-F160-B-K Earbud Gumy Headphone, BlackSBC, AAC
Noise Control
ANC✗✓★
ANC Type—hybrid
Transparency✗✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✗✓★
Bluetooth—5.4★
Multipoint—✓★
Earbud Battery
Battery Life—10 hrs★
Charge Time—0.16699999570846558 hrs★
Fast Charging—10 min for 2 hours playback
ChargingproprietaryUSB-C★
Case Battery
Case Battery—56 hrs★
Case Charging—USB-C★
Wireless Charging—✓★
Microphone
Microphone✗✓★
Mic Count—6★
NC Mic—✓★
Features
Voice Assistant—Google Assistant
Touch Controls—✓★
App—Jlab App
Gaming Mode—✓★
Bone Conduction—✗
Water Resistance—IP55

Pros & Cons

JVC Gumy HAF160B

  • Strong sound (76th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average comfort (30th percentile)

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile

Pricing

JVC Gumy HAF160B is $27 cheaper (4.2x less).

JVC Gumy HAF160B2.923score per dollar
vs
JLab Jbuds Pods ANC2.458score per dollar

JVC Gumy HAF160B offers 1.2x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 35 specs.

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider