Sony WF-C700N

Sony WF-C700N

Sony
77 Overall Score
vs
Philips SHS3200 SHS3300

Philips SHS3200 SHS3300

Philips
31 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Sony WF-C700N

58 out of 100 high confidence 314 reviews

The Sony WF-C700N earbuds receive mixed feedback. Many users praise the sound quality, comfort, and noise cancellation for the price, but a significant number report issues with fit, connectivity, and durability, with some experiencing failures within months. The microphone quality on calls is a common complaint, and the mandatory app setup frustrates some. Overall, it's a budget-friendly option with solid audio but inconsistent reliability.

Pros
  • Great sound quality for price
  • Comfortable fit
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Good battery life
  • Lightweight design
Cons
  • Poor microphone quality on calls
  • Fit issues for some users
  • Connectivity problems
  • Durability concerns
  • Mandatory app installation
👍 Sound quality 25
🤔 Noise cancellation 18
🤔 Fit and comfort 20
👍 Battery life 12
👎 Microphone quality 8
👎 Connectivity 10

Philips SHS3200 SHS3300

55 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

These Philips over-ear hook earbuds have a mixed reputation. Long-time users report a noticeable decline in build quality, with thin cords and frequent one-sided audio failures within months. However, they remain popular among active users who need earbuds that stay put during running, and the sound quality is generally praised for the low price. The main complaints center on durability and a stiff, uncomfortable ear band.

Pros
  • Secure fit during running
  • Good sound quality for price
  • Comfortable ear-hook design
  • Great value at low price
  • Stays in place during activity
Cons
  • Thin, fragile cord
  • One-sided audio failure within months
  • Stiff and uncomfortable ear band
  • Declining build quality over years
  • Interferes with sunglasses
👎 Durability 7
🤔 Fit and comfort 8
👍 Sound quality 5
👍 Value for money 4
👎 Build quality decline 4
👎 Cord quality 3

Scores

Commute
Sony
86
Philips
25
Budget
Sony
85
Philips
53
Travel
Sony
83
Philips
26
Calls
Sony
80
Philips
15
Gaming
Sony
76
Philips
27
Fitness
Sony
73
Philips
32
Music
Sony
72
Philips
40

Specifications

Sony WF-C700NPhilips SHS3200 SHS3300
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessear-hook
Ear TipsSmall, Medium, Large—
Weight0.03 kg0.02 kg★
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size5 mm15 mm★
Drivers—1★
Freq Min33 Hz20 Hz★
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—100 dB★
Hi-Res Audio✓★—
CodecsSBC, AACPhilips SHS3200BK Flexible Earhook Headphones, Black
SurroundSONY WFC700N/G Headphones (Refreshed) | SONY | WF-C700N/G | In-Ear | 1.0000 | July 06, 2023 | With an IPX4 rating, splashes and sweat wont stop these headphones | Turn off your surroundings with Noise—
Noise Control
ANC✓★—
ANC Typeadaptive—
Transparency✓★—
Connectivity
Wireless✓★—
Bluetooth5.2★—
ProfilesA2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HSP—
Multipoint✓★—
Range10 m★—
Earbud Battery
Battery Life15 hrs★—
Charge Time1.5 hrs★—
Fast Charging10 min charge for up to 1 hour of playback—
ChargingUSB-C★proprietary
Case Battery
Case Battery15 hrs★—
Case ChargingUSB-C★—
Wireless Charging✗—
Microphone
Microphone✓★✗
Mic Count2★—
NC Mic✓★—
Features
Voice AssistantSiri, Google Assistant—
Touch Controls✗—
AppSony | Headphones Connect—
Gaming Mode✗—
Bone Conduction✗—
Water ResistanceIPX4—

Pros & Cons

Sony WF-C700N

  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong mic (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong sound (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile

Philips SHS3200 SHS3300

  • Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong sound (72nd percentile)
  • Strong social proof (67th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average mic (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)

Pricing

Philips SHS3200 SHS3300 is $65 cheaper (5.4x less).

Sony WF-C700N0.959score per dollar
vs
Philips SHS3200 SHS33002.096score per dollar

Philips SHS3200 SHS3300 offers 2.2x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony WF-C700N

Scores 77 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 38 specs.

Sony WF-C700N Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider