CASCHO BX17

CASCHO BX17

CASCHO
51 Overall Score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

CASCHO BX17

85 out of 100 medium confidence 10 reviews

Users overwhelmingly praise these over-the-ear earbuds for their exceptional sound clarity, comfortable fit, and long battery life. Many highlight the secure over-ear hooks and multiple ear tip sizes, making them ideal for workouts and extended wear. A few reviewers note occasional issues like ear fatigue after many hours or one side stopping working after months, but the low price point and overall quality make them a strong recommendation. The majority of feedback is highly positive, with many buyers purchasing multiple pairs.

Pros
  • Crystal clear sound quality
  • Comfortable and secure fit
  • Long battery life
  • Easy Bluetooth pairing
  • Good noise isolation
Cons
  • Lacks deep bass
  • Ear fatigue after long use
  • Occasional one-side failure after months
  • Short charging cable (4 inches)
  • Initial crackling issue (software related)
👍 Sound quality 9
👍 Comfort and fit 8
👍 Battery life 6
👍 Value for money 6
👍 Ease of use 5
🤔 Durability 3

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional sound quality, with users highlighting deep bass, clear highs, and immersive audio. Comfort, battery life, and noise cancellation are also frequently commended, though some users note the price is high and volume could be louder. A few minor issues like Bluetooth LE disconnects and initial multi-device pairing were mentioned, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality
  • Deep immersive bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • Limited maximum volume
  • Bluetooth LE disconnects
  • Initial multi-device pairing issues
  • Plastic exterior
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

Scores

Budget
CASCHO
60
Technics
99
Travel
CASCHO
39
Technics
95
Calls
CASCHO
30
Technics
93
Commute
CASCHO
38
Technics
90
Music
CASCHO
42
Technics
90
Gaming
CASCHO
43
Technics
88
Fitness
CASCHO
38
Technics
80

Specifications

CASCHO BX17Technics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-hooktrue wireless
Ear Tips—5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.08 kg0.05 kg★
Audio
Driver Typegraphene diaphragmdynamic
Driver Size14.5 mm★10 mm
Drivers—1★
Freq Min—20 Hz★
Freq Max—40 kHz★
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio—✓★
Codecs—AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
Surround—Dolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC✗✓★
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✓✓
Bluetooth5.35.3
Profiles—AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint—✓★
Wired Connector—Bluetooth
Range—10 m★
Earbud Battery
Battery Life10 hrs★8 hrs
Charge Time—2.5 hrs★
Fast Charging—15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery60 hrs★28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging—✓★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count—6★
NC Mic—✓★
Features
Voice AssistantSiriGoogle Assistant, Siri
Touch Controls✗✓★
App—Android & iOS
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode—✗
Bone Conduction✗✗
Water ResistanceIPX7IPX4

Pros & Cons

CASCHO BX17

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong battery (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile

Pricing

CASCHO BX17 is $195 cheaper (5.9x less).

CASCHO BX171.285score per dollar
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.426score per dollar

CASCHO BX17 offers 3.0x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 39 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider