HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Overall Score
vs
ASUS NUC 13 Pro RNUC13ANKH5048CUI

ASUS NUC 13 Pro RNUC13ANKH5048CUI

ASUS
49 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
HP
91
ASUS
9
Developer
HP
87
ASUS
37
Creator
HP
87
ASUS
16
Home Office
HP
87
ASUS
46
Business
HP
87
ASUS
44
Workstation
HP
85
ASUS
31
Ai Llm
HP
68
ASUS
15
Compact
HP
30
ASUS
53

Specifications

HP OMEN GT16-0364ASUS NUC 13 Pro RNUC13ANKH5048CUI
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8700F★Intel Core i5 13420H
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
16,891
Cores88
Frequency4.1 GHz★2.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB★12 MB
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★Intel Iris Xe
GPU Benchmark Score
28,703
2,593
Typediscreteintegrated★
VRAM12 GB★—
VRAM TypeGDDR7Shared
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB★8 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5★DDR4
Storage 11 TB★512 GB
Storage 1 TypeSSDNVMe SSD★
Build
Form Factormid-towermini
PSU850W★120W
Weight14.50 kg0.48 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports22
USB Ports8★3
Thunderbolt0Thunderbolt 4
HDMI1 x HDMI2x HDMI 2.1 Output
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E★
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit Ethernet2.5GbE
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Pro

Pros & Cons

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

ASUS NUC 13 Pro RNUC13ANKH5048CUI

  • Below average ram (10th percentile)10th %ile

Pricing

ASUS NUC 13 Pro RNUC13ANKH5048CUI is $1,011 cheaper (2.3x less).

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.053score per dollar
vs
ASUS NUC 13 Pro RNUC13ANKH5048CUI0.061score per dollar

ASUS NUC 13 Pro RNUC13ANKH5048CUI offers 1.2x better value for money

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

ASUS NUC 13 Pro RNUC13ANKH5048CUI

Verdict

★ Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

ASUS NUC 13 Pro RNUC13ANKH5048CUI Better at:

Compact

Also Consider