Qehi Qe300A

Qehi Qe300A

Qehi
35 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
Qehi
37
HP
91
Creator
Qehi
31
HP
87
Business
Qehi
29
HP
87
Developer
Qehi
25
HP
87
Home Office
Qehi
31
HP
87
Workstation
Qehi
28
HP
86
Ai Llm
Qehi
20
HP
67
Compact
Qehi
11
HP
31

Specifications

Qehi Qe300AHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 5 4500AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
15,964
30,931
Cores68
Frequency3.6 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*AMD Radeon RX 560NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
3,684
28,703
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM4 GB12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4DDR5
Storage 1256 GB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towermid-tower
PSU850W
Weight8.30 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports8
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1x HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSFreeDOSWindows 11 Home

Pros & Cons

Qehi Qe300A

  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average storage (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average port selection (23rd percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Pricing

Qehi Qe300A is $1,252 cheaper (3.2x less).

Qehi Qe300A0.062score per dollar
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.053score per dollar

Qehi Qe300A offers 1.2x better value for money

Qehi Qe300A

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

Verdict

Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 15 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Also Consider