HP 290 G9 Jet Black

HP 290 G9 Jet Black

HP
62 Overall Score
vs
Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Silver 2025

Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Silver 2025

Apple
96 Overall Score

Scores

Business
HP
69
Apple
96
Home Office
HP
62
Apple
89
Compact
HP
32
Apple
86
Developer
HP
56
Apple
84
Workstation
HP
51
Apple
75
Ai Llm
HP
25
Apple
65
Creator
HP
23
Apple
59
Gaming
HP
13
Apple
43

Specifications

HP 290 G9Apple Mac Studio M4 Max
Processor
CPU*Intel Core i5 12500TApple M4 Max★
CPU Multi-Core Score
16,364
43,903
Cores614★
Frequency2.0 GHz★—
L3 Cache18 MB★—
Graphics
GPU*Intel UHD Graphics 770Apple M4 Max 32-core★
GPU Benchmark Score
1,534
17,798
Typeintegratedintegrated
VRAM TypeSharedUnified
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB36 GB★
RAM GenerationDDR4★—
Storage 11 TB★512 GB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factortowersff
Weight—2.74 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports—6★
USB Ports8★2
Thunderbolt—Thunderbolt 5 x 4
HDMIHDMI1x HDMI
DisplayPort—0
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetoothBluetooth
EthernetEthernet port for wired internetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomemacOS

Pros & Cons

HP 290 G9 Jet Black

  • Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong reliability (70th percentile)
  • Strong port selection (67th percentile)
  • Below average gpu (35th percentile)

Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Silver 2025

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong reliability (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong port selection (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average storage (32nd percentile)

Pricing

HP 290 G9 Jet Black is $1,199 cheaper (2.5x less).

HP 290 G9 Jet Black0.077score per dollar
vs
Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Silver 20250.048score per dollar

HP 290 G9 Jet Black offers 1.6x better value for money

HP 290 G9 Jet Black

Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Silver 2025

Verdict

★ Winner: Apple Mac Studio M4 Max

Scores 96 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 7 of 24 specs.

Apple Mac Studio M4 Max Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Also Consider