BEASTCOM Q5-N-US

BEASTCOM Q5-N-US

BEASTCOM
58 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
95 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
BEASTCOM
55
HP
91
Business
BEASTCOM
48
HP
87
Creator
BEASTCOM
50
HP
87
Developer
BEASTCOM
48
HP
87
Home Office
BEASTCOM
57
HP
87
Workstation
BEASTCOM
48
HP
85
Ai Llm
BEASTCOM
29
HP
67
Compact
BEASTCOM
17
HP
31

Specifications

BEASTCOM Q5-N-USHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 5 4500AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
15,964
30,931
Cores68
Frequency4.1 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB GDDR6NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
10,744
28,703
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM6 GB12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR6GDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towermid-tower
PSU850W
Weight11.07 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports98
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Pros & Cons

BEASTCOM Q5-N-US

  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong storage (73rd percentile)
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Pricing

BEASTCOM Q5-N-US is $860 cheaper (1.9x less).

BEASTCOM Q5-N-US0.061score per dollar
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.053score per dollar

BEASTCOM Q5-N-US offers 1.2x better value for money

BEASTCOM Q5-N-US

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

Verdict

Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Also Consider