Reatan A8

Reatan A8

Reatan
63 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
95 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
Reatan
18
HP
91
Business
Reatan
53
HP
87
Creator
Reatan
29
HP
87
Developer
Reatan
66
HP
87
Home Office
Reatan
61
HP
87
Workstation
Reatan
59
HP
85
Ai Llm
Reatan
30
HP
67
Compact
Reatan
65
HP
31

Specifications

Reatan A8HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 8745HSAMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
28,629
30,931
Cores88
Frequency3.8 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*AMD Radeon 780MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
5,939
28,703
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU850W
Weight14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports22
USB Ports48
ThunderboltUSB40
HDMIHDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPortDP x1 (4K@60Hz)3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.3
Ethernet2.5GbEGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Pros & Cons

Reatan A8

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong port selection (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong storage (73rd percentile)
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Pricing

Reatan A8 is $1,171 cheaper (2.8x less).

Reatan A80.099score per dollar
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.053score per dollar

Reatan A8 offers 1.9x better value for money

Reatan A8

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

Verdict

Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 9 of 26 specs.

Reatan A8 Better at:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Also Consider