Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5

Dell
76 Overall Score
vs
Intel LE80537GF0534M

Intel LE80537GF0534M

Intel
80 Overall Score

Scores

Efficiency
Dell
42
Intel
90
Productivity
Dell
89
Intel
84
Server
Dell
83
Intel
71
Budget
Dell
48
Intel
83
Ai Llm
Dell
79
Intel
75
Gaming
Dell
47
Intel
76

Specifications

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2Intel LE80537GF0534M
Processor
BrandIntelIntel
SeriesXeonCore 2 Duo
Model9455T7600
CodenameTurinRaphael
Classservermobile
Process4★5
Cores & Clocks
Cores32★2
P-cores48★6
Threads64★2
Base Clock
2,000
2,330
Boost Clock
3,500
5,100
Cache
L2 Cache48★6
L3 Cache
256
32
Performance
PassMark Multi
110,697
26,975
PassMark Single
3,783
3,908
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4DDR5★
Max Speed
6,000
5,200
Max Memory
2,048
No data
ECC✓✓
Platform & Power
SocketSocket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)LGA 2066
PCIe3.05.0
PCIe Lanes64★24
TDP20065★
Max Turbo Power350★—
Unlocked✗✓★
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsNoRadeon Graphics

Pros & Cons

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5

  • Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong feature (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Intel LE80537GF0534M

  • Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong efficiency (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong single thread (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong platform (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5 is $17 cheaper (1.3x less).

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP51.495score per dollar
vs
Intel LE80537GF0534M1.173score per dollar

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5 offers 1.3x better value for money

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core AMD Socket SP5

Intel LE80537GF0534M

Verdict

★ Winner: Intel LE80537GF0534M

Scores 80 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 6 of 26 specs.

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Better at:

Ai LlmServerProductivity

Intel LE80537GF0534M Better at:

BudgetGamingEfficiency

Also Consider