Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)

Dell
52 Overall Score
vs
Intel E5-2690 V2 10-core LGA 2011

Intel E5-2690 V2 10-core LGA 2011

Intel
42 Overall Score

Scores

Ai Llm
Dell
62
Intel
39
Productivity
Dell
58
Intel
53
Server
Dell
51
Intel
49
Budget
Dell
44
Intel
43
Gaming
Dell
32
Intel
22
Efficiency
Dell
19
Intel
27

Specifications

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2Intel E5-2690 V2
Processor
BrandIntelIntel
SeriesXeonXeon
Model5-2637 V2E5-2690 V2
CodenameTurin—
Classserverserver
Process4★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores32★10
P-cores48★—
Threads64★—
Base Clock
2,000
3,000
Boost Clock
3,500
No data
Cache
L2 Cache48★—
L3 Cache
256
25
Performance
PassMark Multi
6,486
13,295
PassMark Single
1,937
1,853
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4★—
Max Speed
6,000
8,000
Max Memory
2,048
No data
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketSocket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)LGA 2011
PCIe3.0—
PCIe Lanes64★—
TDP200130★
Max Turbo Power350★—
Unlocked✗—
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsNo—

Pros & Cons

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)

  • Strong ai (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong affordability (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong platform (77th percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (32nd percentile)

Intel E5-2690 V2 10-core LGA 2011

  • Strong affordability (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (66th percentile)
  • Below average feature (21st percentile)

Pricing

Intel E5-2690 V2 10-core LGA 2011 is $21 cheaper (1.7x less).

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)1.018score per dollar
vs
Intel E5-2690 V2 10-core LGA 20111.408score per dollar

Intel E5-2690 V2 10-core LGA 2011 offers 1.4x better value for money

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)

Intel E5-2690 V2 10-core LGA 2011

Verdict

★ Winner: Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2

Scores 52 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 26 specs.

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingServerProductivity

Intel E5-2690 V2 Better at:

Efficiency

Also Consider