Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 Overall Score
vs
AMD Epyc 9355P
AMD
80 Overall Score
Scores
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Gaming
Budget
Efficiency
Specifications
| Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5 | AMD Epyc 9355P | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Series | — | EPYC |
| Model | 000 | 9355P |
| Codename | — | Turin |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | — | 4★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 32★ |
| P-cores | — | 32★ |
| Threads | — | 64★ |
| Base Clock | No data | |
| Boost Clock | No data | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 32★ |
| L3 Cache | No data | |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | No data | |
| PassMark Single | No data | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | No data | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | SP5 |
| PCIe | — | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | No data | |
| TDP | — | 280★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 300★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
AMD Epyc 9355P
- Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong platform (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong efficiency (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
Pricing
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM50.546score per dollar
vs
AMD Epyc 9355P0.016score per dollar
Thermal Grizzly CSF-AM5 offers 34.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: AMD Epyc 9355P
Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 24 specs.
