Intel CD8069504449801

Intel CD8069504449801

Intel
59 Overall Score
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
7 Overall Score

Scores

Productivity
Intel
72
MICRO CENTER
6
Server
Intel
62
MICRO CENTER
4
Ai Llm
Intel
57
MICRO CENTER
4
Budget
Intel
39
MICRO CENTER
9
Gaming
Intel
31
MICRO CENTER
7
Efficiency
Intel
31
MICRO CENTER
5

Specifications

Intel CD8069504449801MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Processor
BrandIntel—
SeriesXeon Gold—
Model6246R—
Classserver—
Cores & Clocks
Cores16★—
Threads32★—
Base Clock
3,400
No data
Boost Clock
4,100
No data
Cache
L2 Cache16★—
L3 Cache35.75★—
Performance
PassMark Multi
30,468
No data
PassMark Single
2,341
No data
Platform & Power
SocketFCLGA3647—
TDP205★—
Unlocked✗—

Pros & Cons

Intel CD8069504449801

  • Strong ai (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (69th percentile)
  • Strong single thread (66th percentile)
  • Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Intel CD80695044498010.066score per dollar
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.007score per dollar

Intel CD8069504449801 offers 9.4x better value for money

Intel CD8069504449801

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Verdict

★ Winner: Intel CD8069504449801

Scores 59 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 15 specs.

Intel CD8069504449801 Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Also Consider