Intel X5650 6-core LGA1366

Intel X5650 6-core LGA1366

Intel
37 Overall Score
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

Intel
61 Overall Score

Scores

Efficiency
Intel
38
Intel
70
Productivity
Intel
39
Intel
63
Budget
Intel
61
Intel
54
Ai Llm
Intel
34
Intel
60
Server
Intel
35
Intel
57
Gaming
Intel
29
Intel
53

Specifications

Intel X5650Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Processor
BrandIntelIntel
Series—Core Ultra 9
ModelX5650285
Codename—Zen
Classdesktopdesktop
Process—14★
Cores & Clocks
Cores624★
P-cores—8★
E-cores—16★
Threads1224★
Base Clock
2,660
3,000
Boost Clock
3,060
5,600
Cache
L2 Cache—4★
L3 Cache1216★
Performance
PassMark Multi
5,762
14,751
PassMark Single
1,291
1,997
Memory
Memory TypeDDR3DDR5★
Max Speed
1,333
2,666
Channels3★—
Max Memory
288
No data
ECC✓✓
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1366LGA 1700
PCIe—5.0
PCIe Lanes—16★
TDP9565★
Unlocked—✓★

Pros & Cons

Intel X5650 6-core LGA1366

  • Strong affordability (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong platform (66th percentile)
  • Below average feature (21st percentile)
  • Below average single thread (27th percentile)
  • Below average ai (32nd percentile)

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

  • Strong platform (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong feature (75th percentile)
  • Strong multi thread (69th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (13th percentile)13th %ile

Pricing

Intel X5650 6-core LGA1366 is $585 cheaper (31.8x less).

Intel X5650 6-core LGA13661.933score per dollar
vs
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 17000.101score per dollar

Intel X5650 6-core LGA1366 offers 19.1x better value for money

Intel X5650 6-core LGA1366

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 24-core LGA 1700

Verdict

★ Winner: Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Scores 61 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 26 specs.

Intel X5650 Better at:

Budget

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Also Consider