fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1
26 Overall Score
vs
AMD 100-000000790

AMD 100-000000790

AMD
83 Overall Score

Scores

Server
fosa1
23
AMD
100
Productivity
fosa1
26
AMD
95
Ai Llm
fosa1
23
AMD
94
Budget
fosa1
27
AMD
50
Gaming
fosa1
25
AMD
49
Efficiency
fosa1
23
AMD
42

Specifications

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izudAMD 100-000000790
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
Series—EPYC
ModelX56509554
Codename—Genoa
Classdesktopserver
Process—5★
Cores & Clocks
Cores664★
P-cores—64★
Threads
12
128
Base Clock
2,660
3,100
Boost Clock
3,060
3,750
Cache
L2 Cache—64★
L3 Cache
12
384
Performance
PassMark MultiNo data
102,607
PassMark SingleNo data
2,839
Memory
Memory TypeDDR3DDR5★
Max Speed
1,333
4,800
Channels312★
Max Memory
288
No data
ECC✓✓
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1366SP5
PCIe—5.0
PCIe LanesNo data
128
TDP95★360
Max Turbo Power—400★
Unlocked—✗

Pros & Cons

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

  • Strong social proof (65th percentile)
  • Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (25th percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (25th percentile)
  • Below average ai (26th percentile)

AMD 100-000000790

  • Strong platform (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong ai (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile

Pricing

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud is $3,715 cheaper (196.7x less).

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud1.359score per dollar
vs
AMD 100-0000007900.022score per dollar

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud offers 61.8x better value for money

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

AMD 100-000000790

Verdict

★ Winner: AMD 100-000000790

Scores 83 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 26 specs.

AMD 100-000000790 Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Also Consider