AMD 100-100001478WOF

AMD 100-100001478WOF

AMD
78 Overall Score
vs
fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1
26 Overall Score

Scores

Productivity
AMD
93
fosa1
26
Server
AMD
90
fosa1
23
Ai Llm
AMD
80
fosa1
23
Efficiency
AMD
62
fosa1
23
Budget
AMD
53
fosa1
27
Gaming
AMD
48
fosa1
25

Specifications

AMD 100-100001478WOFfosa1 fosa4ycn78izud
Processor
BrandAMDIntel
SeriesEPYC—
Model4464PX5650
CodenameZen4—
Classserverdesktop
Process5★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores12★6
P-cores12★—
Threads24★12
Base Clock
3,700
2,660
Boost Clock
5,400
3,060
Cache
L2 Cache12★—
L3 Cache64★12
Performance
PassMark Multi
47,514
No data
PassMark Single
4,146
No data
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★DDR3
Max Speed
5,200
1,333
Channels—3★
Max Memory
2,048
288
ECC✓✓
Platform & Power
SocketAM5LGA1366
PCIe5.0—
PCIe Lanes64★—
TDP65★95
Max Turbo Power65★—
Unlocked✓★—
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsRadeon Graphics—

Pros & Cons

AMD 100-100001478WOF

  • Strong efficiency (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong single thread (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong feature (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong multi thread (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

  • Strong social proof (65th percentile)
  • Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (25th percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (25th percentile)
  • Below average ai (26th percentile)

Pricing

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud is $445 cheaper (24.4x less).

AMD 100-100001478WOF0.169score per dollar
vs
fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud1.359score per dollar

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud offers 8.0x better value for money

AMD 100-100001478WOF

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

Verdict

★ Winner: AMD 100-100001478WOF

Scores 78 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 27 specs.

AMD 100-100001478WOF Better at:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Also Consider