Sony Alpha a6000 White 2020
Sony
50 Overall Score
vs
FLATIC CDR2L
FLATIC
29 Overall Score
Scores
Product Photography
Photography
Streaming
Beginner
Youtube
Vlogging
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Video
Travel
Specifications
| Sony Alpha a6000 | FLATIC CDR2L | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | aps-c | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | 24.299999237060547 MP | 64 MP★ |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Processor | BIONZ X image processor | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection AF / contrast-detection AF) | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 11 fps★ | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 4K★ |
| 1080p FPS | 60 fps★ | — |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | H.264 | MP4 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3"★ | — |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | 1.4M dots★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.29 kg★ | 0.36 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | ✗ |
| USB | USB | — |
| HDMI | Yes | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Sony Alpha a6000 White 2020
- Strong sensor (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong af (72th percentile)
- Strong evf (71th percentile)
- Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average stabilization (31th percentile)
FLATIC CDR2L
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Strong sensor (74th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average af (31th percentile)
Pricing
Sony Alpha a6000 White 20200.057score per dollar
vs
FLATIC CDR2L0.723score per dollar
FLATIC CDR2L offers 12.7x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sony Alpha a6000
Scores 50 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.
