SMARTKLIK
SMARTKLIK
33 Overall Score
vs
SJCAM C400
SJCAM
50 Overall Score
Scores
Youtube
Video
Vlogging
Beginner
Streaming
Wedding Events
Travel
Product Photography
Sports Wildlife
Photography
Specifications
| SMARTKLIK | SJCAM C400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Megapixels | 75 MP★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Log Profile | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codec | — | MP4 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 2.3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.23 kg★ | 0.78 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✗ |
| USB | USB-C★ | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
SMARTKLIK
- Strong sensor (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (79th percentile)
- Strong video (70th percentile)
- Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average display (30th percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
SJCAM C400
- Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong display (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (78th percentile)
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Pricing
SMARTKLIK0.552score per dollar
vs
SJCAM C4000.292score per dollar
SMARTKLIK offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: SJCAM C400
Scores 50 overall, wins 9 of 10 usage categories and 5 of 14 specs.
