Fujifilm X-H1 X-H1
Fujifilm
85 Overall Score
vs
Sennheiser MKE 400 MKE 400 Clear
Sennheiser
26 Overall Score
Scores
Photography
Sports Wildlife
Product Photography
Wedding Events
Beginner
Video
Youtube
Vlogging
Travel
Streaming
Specifications
| Fujifilm X-H1 X-H1 | Sennheiser MKE 400 MKE 400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | X-Trans CMOS III | — |
| Size | aps-c | — |
| Megapixels | 24.299999237060547 MP★ | — |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Processor | X-Processor Pro | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | Phase Detection: 325 | — |
| Eye AF | ✗ | — |
| Animal AF | ✓★ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✗ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 100 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/32000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | — |
| 4K FPS | 30 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 120 fps★ | — |
| 10-bit | ✗ | — |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| RAW Video | ✗ | — |
| Codec | H.264, H.265 | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | — |
| Articulating | ✓★ | — |
| EVF Resolution | 3.7M dots★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 1.00 kg | 0.34 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Hot Shoe | ✓ | ✓ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm X-H1 X-H1
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong burst (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong evf (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong sensor (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Sennheiser MKE 400 MKE 400 Clear
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
- Below average display (28th percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
Pricing
Fujifilm X-H1 X-H10.061score per dollar
vs
Sennheiser MKE 400 MKE 400 Clear0.137score per dollar
Sennheiser MKE 400 MKE 400 Clear offers 2.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm X-H1 X-H1
Scores 85 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 17 of 29 specs.
