Reolink TrackFlex Floodlight WiFi
Reolink
35 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm X-H1 X-H1
Fujifilm
86 Overall Score
Scores
Photography
Sports Wildlife
Product Photography
Wedding Events
Beginner
Video
Youtube
Vlogging
Travel
Streaming
Specifications
| Reolink TrackFlex Floodlight WiFi | Fujifilm X-H1 X-H1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | X-Trans CMOS III |
| Size | — | aps-c |
| Megapixels | — | 24.299999237060547 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Processor | — | X-Processor Pro |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | — | Phase Detection: 325 |
| Eye AF | — | ✗ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 100 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 120 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✗ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✗ |
| Codec | — | H.264, H.265 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 3.7M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | — | 1.00 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Reolink TrackFlex Floodlight WiFi
- Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong af (69th percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
- Below average display (30th percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Fujifilm X-H1 X-H1
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong burst (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong evf (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong sensor (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Pricing
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm X-H1 X-H1
Scores 86 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 15 of 29 specs.
