Minolta MN40WP MN40WP Blue
Minolta
42 Overall Score
vs
Canon EOS R5 Mark II R5 Mark II Black 2024
Canon
92 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Minolta MN40WP MN40WP Blue
No customer feedback yet
Canon EOS R5 Mark II R5 Mark II Black 2024
78 out of 100 high confidence 170 reviews
The Canon EOS R5 Mark II is widely praised for its exceptional autofocus, especially for sports and wildlife, with many users noting a significant upgrade from the original R5. However, several reviewers report overheating issues during extended use, particularly in warm conditions, and some express disappointment with high ISO noise and occasional freezing or autofocus failures. The camera's pre-capture and eye-tracking features are game-changers for action photography, but the need for new LP-E6P batteries to unlock full functionality is a common frustration.
Pros
- Exceptional autofocus speed and accuracy
- Excellent for sports and wildlife photography
- Pre-capture feature for action shots
- Eye-tracking autofocus works well
- Improved viewfinder with no blackout
Cons
- Overheating during extended use
- High ISO noise at higher settings
- Occasional freezing and lockups
- Autofocus failures in some conditions
- Requires new LP-E6P batteries for full functionality
Autofocus performance 35
Overheating issues 12
High iso noise 8
Battery compatibility 10
Pre capture feature 9
Build quality 15
Scores
Beginner
Video
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Photography
Youtube
Product Photography
Travel
Streaming
Vlogging
Specifications
| Minolta MN40WP MN40WP | Canon EOS R5 Mark II R5 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | BSI CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | full-frame |
| Megapixels | 48 MP★ | 45 MP |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Processor | — | DIGIC Accelerator |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | ||
| AF Type | — | PhotoPhase Detection: 1053VideoPhase Detection: 975 |
| Eye AF | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 10 fps | 30 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 8K★ |
| 4K FPS | 30 fps | 120 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264/MP4/XF-AVC S/XF-HEVC S 4:2:2/4:2:0 8/10-Bit |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3.2"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 5.8M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.18 kg★ | 0.59 kg |
| Battery Life | 100 shots | 320 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| HDMI | — | HDMI Output |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Minolta MN40WP MN40WP Blue
- Strong stabilization (78th percentile)
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong build (74th percentile)
- Strong burst (72nd percentile)
- Below average battery (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average af (0th percentile)0th %ile
Canon EOS R5 Mark II R5 Mark II Black 2024
- Strong display (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong video (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong evf (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Pricing
Minolta MN40WP MN40WP Blue0.490score per dollar
vs
Canon EOS R5 Mark II R5 Mark II Black 20240.026score per dollar
Minolta MN40WP MN40WP Blue offers 18.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II R5 Mark II
Scores 92 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 20 of 33 specs.
