Nikon Z fc Z fc Chalk Blue 2022
Nikon
81 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2 Black 2023
Fujifilm
98 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Nikon Z fc Z fc Chalk Blue 2022
No customer feedback yet
Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2 Black 2023
88 out of 100 high confidence 51 reviews
The Fujifilm X-H2 is widely praised for its exceptional image quality, robust build, and versatile hybrid performance. Users highlight the superb 40MP sensor, excellent ergonomics, and reliable autofocus, especially after firmware updates. Some note the learning curve from previous models and the lack of a dedicated ISO dial, but overall it is considered a top-tier APS-C camera that delivers outstanding value.
Pros
- Excellent image quality
- Great ergonomics and build
- Reliable autofocus after updates
- Superb 40MP sensor
- Versatile hybrid performance
Cons
- Low light performance could be better
- Autofocus lags industry leaders initially
- No dedicated ISO dial
- Learning curve from previous models
- RAW file compatibility issues with some software
Image quality 15
Autofocus performance 8
Build quality 10
Ergonomics 9
Value for money 6
Low light performance 3
Scores
Photography
Wedding Events
Product Photography
Video
Beginner
Youtube
Sports Wildlife
Travel
Streaming
Vlogging
Specifications
| Nikon Z fc Z fc | Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | aps-c | aps-c |
| Megapixels | 20.899999618530273 MP | 40.20000076293945 MP★ |
| ISO Range | 100★ | 125 |
| Processor | EXPEED 6 | X-Processor 5 |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | ||
| AF Type | Phase Detection: 209 | Photo, VideoContrast Detection, Phase Detection: 425 |
| Eye AF | ✓ | ✓ |
| Animal AF | ✓ | ✓ |
| Subject Detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 11 fps | 15 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | 120 fps★ | 20 fps |
| Max Shutter | 1/4000 | 1/8000 |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 8K★ |
| 4K FPS | 30 fps | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | 120 fps | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | ✗ | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Codec | H.264/MOV/MP4 | MOV/MP4/MPEG-4 AVC/ProRes 422/ProRes 422 HQ/ProRes 422LT |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
| Touchscreen | ✓ | ✓ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | 2.4M dots | 5.8M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.39 kg★ | 0.58 kg |
| Battery Life | 300 shots | 680 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI | HDMI Type A |
| Hot Shoe | ✓ | ✓ |
Pros & Cons
Nikon Z fc Z fc Chalk Blue 2022
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong burst (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong video (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2 Black 2023
- Strong sensor (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong evf (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong video (96th percentile)96th %ile
Pricing
Nikon Z fc Z fc Chalk Blue 20220.107score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2 Black 20230.053score per dollar
Nikon Z fc Z fc Chalk Blue 2022 offers 2.0x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2
Scores 98 overall, wins 8 of 10 usage categories and 11 of 33 specs.
