Fujifilm X-H2S X-H2S Black 2022
Fujifilm
68 Overall Score
vs
Canon EOS R6 R6 Mark III
Canon
88 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Fujifilm X-H2S X-H2S Black 2022
No customer feedback yet
Canon EOS R6 R6 Mark III
85 out of 100 high confidence 97 reviews
The Canon EOS R6 Mark III is widely praised for its exceptional autofocus, impressive low-light performance, and robust build quality. Many users upgrading from older DSLRs or mirrorless models report a significant leap in speed and image quality, especially for wildlife and action photography. However, a recurring complaint is the overly complex menu system and steep learning curve, which some find frustrating. Overall, it is considered a top-tier hybrid camera that delivers professional results, though the price and power consumption are noted drawbacks.
Pros
- Exceptional autofocus performance
- Excellent low-light and high ISO capability
- Robust build quality and ergonomics
- Fast burst shooting up to 40 fps
- Great image quality and color reproduction
Cons
- Overly complex and unintuitive menu system
- Steep learning curve for new users
- High power consumption requiring backup batteries
- Expensive price point
- Limited battery grip compatibility
Autofocus performance 18
Low light performance 12
Build quality 10
Menu complexity 8
Value for money 7
Battery life 5
Scores
Beginner
Photography
Youtube
Video
Product Photography
Wedding Events
Sports Wildlife
Vlogging
Streaming
Travel
Specifications
| Fujifilm X-H2S X-H2S | Canon EOS R6 R6 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | X-Trans CMOS 5 HS | CMOS |
| Size | aps-c | full-frame |
| Megapixels | 26.100000381469727 MP | 32.5 MP★ |
| ISO Range | 160 | 100★ |
| Processor | X-Processor 5 | DIGIC X |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | ||
| AF Type | — | Photo, VideoPhase Detection: 1053 |
| Eye AF | ✓ | ✓ |
| Animal AF | ✓ | ✓ |
| Subject Detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 15 fps | 40 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | 40 fps | 40 fps |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/16000 |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 6K★ | 4K |
| 4K FPS | 120 fps★ | 60 fps |
| 1080p FPS | 240 fps★ | 180 fps |
| 10-bit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Log Profile | ✓ | ✓ |
| RAW Video | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codec | Apple ProRes 422 HQ, ProRes 422, ProRes 422 LT, ProRes 422 Proxy | H.264, H.265, ProRes RAW |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | 5.8M dots★ | 3.7M dots |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | — | 0.61 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 620 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| HDMI | Type A | HDMI Output |
| Hot Shoe | ✓ | ✓ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm X-H2S X-H2S Black 2022
- Strong evf (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sensor (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong af (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average display (30th percentile)
- Below average social proof (34th percentile)
Canon EOS R6 R6 Mark III
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm X-H2S X-H2S Black 20220.023score per dollar
vs
Canon EOS R6 R6 Mark III0.033score per dollar
Canon EOS R6 R6 Mark III offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Canon EOS R6 R6 Mark III
Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 10 usage categories and 11 of 33 specs.
