Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Silver 2016

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Silver 2016

Olympus
80 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z20121

Nikon NIKKOR Z20121

Nikon
29 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Silver 2016

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II is highly praised for its superb image stabilization, lightweight build, and excellent handling, making it a favorite for hiking and nature photography. Users appreciate its value, especially when compared to the Mark III, and note that it remains a capable camera despite its age. Some minor drawbacks include the lack of GPS, no pinch zoom on the touchscreen, and the need for firmware updates with older lenses.

Pros
  • Excellent image stabilization
  • Lightweight and compact
  • Comfortable grip and handling
  • Great value for money
  • High-quality images
Cons
  • No built-in GPS
  • No pinch zoom on touchscreen
  • Firmware updates needed for older lenses
  • Screen protector may prevent flush closing
  • No slow motion above 60fps
👍 Image stabilization 5
👍 Value for money 4
👍 Build quality 3
👍 Portability 3
👍 Lens compatibility 3
👎 Gps 2

Nikon NIKKOR Z20121

72 out of 100 medium confidence 12 reviews

The Nikon 40mm f/2 SE lens is widely praised for its compact size, lightweight design, and fast autofocus, making it a favorite for everyday and street photography. Users appreciate the beautiful rendering and value for money, though some note it is not as sharp as the S-line lenses and lacks a lens hood. A few complaints mention misleading packaging and a back-focus issue, but overall sentiment is positive.

Pros
  • Compact and lightweight
  • Fast autofocus
  • Beautiful image rendering
  • Great value for money
  • Ideal for street photography
Cons
  • Not as sharp as S-line lenses
  • No lens hood included
  • Back-focus issue reported
  • Misleading packaging (non-SE version sent)
  • Slower autofocus compared to 28mm SE
👍 Image quality 8
👍 Build quality 5
👍 Value for money 4
🤔 Autofocus performance 4
👎 Packaging accuracy 2
👎 Lens hood inclusion 2

Scores

Beginner
Olympus
90
Nikon
52
Sports Wildlife
Olympus
79
Nikon
42
Streaming
Olympus
77
Nikon
26
Wedding Events
Olympus
75
Nikon
36
Photography
Olympus
75
Nikon
36
Vlogging
Olympus
74
Nikon
23
Video
Olympus
74
Nikon
25
Product Photography
Olympus
74
Nikon
27
Travel
Olympus
73
Nikon
37
Youtube
Olympus
71
Nikon
21

Specifications

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IINikon NIKKOR Z20121
Sensor
TypeMOS—
Sizemicro-four-thirdsfull-frame
Megapixels20.299999237060547 MP★—
ISO Range200★—
ProcessorTruePic VIII—
Autofocus
AF Points
121
No data
AF TypeContrast Detection: 121 (121 Cross-Type)Contrast Detection: 121—
Eye AF✓✓
Animal AF✗—
Subject Detection✓✓
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)15 fps★—
Burst (Electronic)60 fps★—
Max Shutter1/16000—
Electronic Shutter✓★—
Video
Max Resolution4K★—
4K FPS30 fps★—
1080p FPS120 fps★—
10-bit✗—
Log Profile✗—
RAW Video✗—
CodecH.264—
Display & EVF
Screen Size3"★—
Touchscreen✓★—
Articulating✓★—
EVF Resolution2.4M dots★—
Build
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.50 kg0.17 kg★
Connectivity
Wi-Fi✓★—
Bluetooth✗—
USBUSB-C (USB 2.0)★—
HDMIMicro-HDMI—
Hot Shoe✓★—

Pros & Cons

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Silver 2016

  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong burst (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (89th percentile)89th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z20121

  • Strong af (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong build (72nd percentile)
  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average video (25th percentile)
  • Below average display (30th percentile)

Pricing

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Silver 2016

Nikon NIKKOR Z20121

Verdict

★ Winner: Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Scores 80 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 16 of 32 specs.

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Better at:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Also Consider